Posts Tagged ‘PR’

Top PR & Social Media Agency Players: Yorkshire

Thursday, March 17th, 2011

Umpf is a Leeds-based nationally-respected, creative PR and social media agency with many awards to its name.

The Top PR & Social Media Agency Players: Yorkshire is a table – ranked independently by PeerIndex – of the main players in the PR and social media industry in the Yorkshire and Humber region.

Top PR & Social Media Agency Players YorkshireIt is designed to show a snapshot of the key figures working within PR and social media agencies (not including in-house professionals) and is ranked according to influence by PeerIndex.

PeerIndex helps you understand your online reputation, rating your ‘social capital’ through “topic-based authority rankings”.

The service analyses publicly available data (your Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn and, now, Quora public profiles) to create a picture of your authority and activity on a given subject.

We have tried to include everyone in the region in the list; if you’re not in the table and you’d like to be added @reply @adrian_johnson.  Please note the criteria for entry, below.

Live stream from PeerIndex of the Top PR & Social Media Agency Players: Yorkshire

This table was inspired by Andrew Smith’s original PRWeek Power List.

Entry criteria
*First and foremost it is for staff working in PR and/or social media agencies who are based in Yorkshire. Notable exclusions: if you’re from Yorkshire, or one of your agency’s offices are in Yorkshire, but you yourself are based in the London office.

*One of the things the table may be used for is suppliers looking for PR/social media professionals, so in-house PR/social media staff are not included.

*It does not include agencies outside PR/social media eg marketing, advertising, sales promotion, branding, SEO/PPC, etc etc. Notable inclusions: if your agency offers PR/social media services to external businesses (ie not in-house PR/social media to promote your own agency), staff who fulfil those roles for clients will be included.

*Networked PR/social media agencies with multiple offices will only be listed by their Yorkshire office. So @National_PR_Agency_Co would not be listed, but, for example, @GraylingNorth is.

Social Media Round Up of The Week – 4 March

Friday, March 4th, 2011

Here’s the top stories in social media that have got us talking this past week.Like button

1. Facebook says goodbye to the ‘Share’ button in favour of the ‘Like’ button

2. Malaysian airlines launches Facebook check-in and booking service

3. Foursquare gives Manchester the ‘World’s rudest city’ title

4. Facebook for dog lovers.  Yes, really.

chinadog_1836315b5. Lucozade targets social media users via Spotify

6. Charlie Sheen sets new Twitter Guinness World Record

You can see our separate social media campaign video round-up on the Umpf YouTube channel.

Be sure to share any stories you think should be in next week’s round up by emailing social@umpf.co.uk

Is Social Media Becoming a Numbers Game?

Thursday, February 3rd, 2011

As a social media agency it won’t come as any surprise that we monitor and manage multiple channels (Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, Flickr, etc) on behalf of our clients.  Each channel has its own list of followers, fans and friends and often we concentrate on specific channels according to the client’s wishes and our recommendations.864731_lucky_numbers_3

Twitter is often a popular choice for brands, but as more and more enter the Twitter-sphere we’re noticing how differently companies worldwide are reacting, responding and engaging in conversations in a comparison to the next – some doing it better than others.

Naturally, each of the brands will be trying to satisfy their own objectives for utilising a social media channel such as Twitter – objectives that are often associated with follower numbers or mentions.  However, are these objectives a good measurement of the extent of engagement their brand is achieving within a genuine target audience?  Or are they in fact just a host of numbers to show that a job is being done?

Many brands may measure their success on Twitter by the number of followers they have, something that can actually be counter-productive.  It’s easy to become obsessed with having follower numbers into the thousands or tens of thousands, but blindly following irrelevant people in the hope that some may follow you back is actually a method of spamming (we don’t like spamming- see previous blogs) and besides, it doesn’t really get anyone anywhere.  The key to Twitter from a brand’s perspective is to engage and interact with followers who are relevant to a business, enabling the brand to have conversations online and create a public community.

We also see people attributing the number of tweets they’ve posted as a sign of a successful Twitter account. This might actually signal that the brand is not really listening or engaging with their followers but is posting impersonal, untimely tweets- often about themselves or something their brand is doing.  It’s not a great way of achieving engagement and interaction that we’re looking for when communicating through social media.

On the contrary, numbers can often be useful where retweets or @ mentions are concerned.  Someone retweeting your post normally signals that you’ve said something interesting.  Similarly, if an @ mention is responding to something you’ve tweeted then you have successfully managed to engage with a follower and should continue to try and keep the conversation between them interesting and ongoing.

We’re well aware that the quality versus quantity argument is alive and well in the social media arena and despite there being ongoing criticism in the traditional PR remit (we won’t start on payment by results) there doesn’t seem to be any lessons learnt so far, and unfortunately we sense a similar fate for social media channels.  We’re not holding our breath for Twitter to be approached in a ‘best practice’ kind of way anytime soon, but we hope that brands will begin to realise that following any old ‘Tom, Dick or Harry’ is not strategic and is in fact just a numbers game.

Helping the ‘Hand of God’ with social media

Thursday, July 1st, 2010

Handball #FAIL

Each month, Communicate magazine poses a crisis management situation from a historical event and asks agencies for modern say solutions. This month it’s World Cup-themed and we’re rewinding back to 1986 and England’s World Cup quarter-final with Argentina and ‘that’ handball incident…

“Diego Maradona scores the decisive goal with a clear hand ball. England are outraged. With video evidence irrefutable, what advice would you give to Diego to protect his brand, retain his commercial endorsements, and calm the diplomatic crisis?”

Umpf’s response (full article here):

Only ‘sorry’, humility, humour and social media can save brand Maradona.

Because of his outrageous behaviour, first must come a personal apology from Maradona to every man, woman and child in England.

We’d film an apology for an online video. Enter a friend’s name, email and their photo, hit send and they receive a link to a bespoke video showing Maradona personally apologising by holding up a photo of the friend. Spreading virally, Maradona would be seen to be offering personal apologies across the land.

Next, the humour. First, a quick commercial tie-up with a Bluetooth headset company so Maradona can go ‘hands-free’ without losing any more friends.

Second, a short online video for brand Maradona showing what would have happened if his handball had not gone in the net. This time Shilton saves it and England go on to win the World Cup. Back home, Argentina revolts and Maradona becomes reviled.

In the final shot of the film we see Maradona, a broken man, begging on the streets of Buenos Aires. The camera zooms out to show Maradona begging with a friend – fellow handball ‘goal thief’ Thierry Henry.

Hosted on Maradona’s YouTube Channel, and launched through his Twitter feed, the video would demonstrate humility, humour and social media savoir-faire.

Communicate Magazine: Hand of God