Social Media Plays Host To This Year’s General Election

March 9th, 2010
Brown & Cameron (socila media buddies?)

Brown & Cameron: social media buddies? Source: Telegraph.co.uk

With social media becoming an increasingly popular tool, it seemed inevitable that 2010’s general election would see parties employing some elements within campaign strategy; however the degree to which it has been embraced by each candidate could not have been anticipated, resulting in it being dubbed: “the first word-of-mouth election”.

In run up to this year’s general election, tech-savvy politicians can be seen unashamedly flexing their weight of knowledge in this latest communication tool, across the worldwide web.

Labour has pre-emptively armed party members with new-media training, ensuring a smooth execution of this newest tactic; and with daily online video podcasts from senior campaign politicians, as well as real-time Twitter feedback, it is not surprising that such rigorous preparation has been undertaken.

Alongside this, Labour has cleverly optimised traffic to its own website using Google Adwords, resulting in constituents who are searching hot debate topics – such as: the economy, education and employment – are driven here primarily, receiving Labour’s take on the subject first.

While the Conservative party, not wanting to disappoint, have released an iPhone app, where users can receive a continuous flow  of up-to-date news on campaign progress, as well as takes on legislation, public policy and party memorandums.

Modern day constituents are demanding more transparency from MPs, social media offers a platform to achieve this. If these latest campaigns are anything to go by, it would appear that politicians are beginning to recognise and appreciate social media as a credible and effective communication channel, key to winning any election.

- Lydia Cambata

NB. Umpf has no affiliation to any political party, with the above comments regarding social media, rather than the efficiencies of one party’s campaign over another.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Fark
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Print this article!

http://You.re/SoVain

February 24th, 2010

NIKEThe Umpf blog has been a bit neglected of late (setting up a new agency can be time consuming) and I’ve been meaning to write something interesting for a while. So just when I was looking for an excuse, Nike served one up.  Swoosh.

This week, their football Tweets @NikeFootball (5,000+ Followers) started using a bit.ly vanity URL http://bit.ly/writehistorylive.  As you’ll see it takes you to an app on their Facebook Fan page (almost a third of a million fans).

If you’re new to URL shorteners such as bit.ly and is.gd (and there are hundreds of services out there), they take a long URL like http://www.facebook.com/nikefootball?v=app_10442206389&ref=ts (which eats up 61 of your 140-chracter Tweet) and shortens it to something like http://bit.ly/9HQmpy (20 characters). Both direct users to exactly the same place.

So rather than use a short bit.ly link, typically http://bit.ly/ [and then a randomly allocated  set of six alphanumeric characters with letters in upper and lower case], Nike has gone for a vanity title ‘writehistorylive’ to increase social media campaign recognition.

At the time of writing they’d had more than 6,500 clicks on their bit.ly vanity URL.  But see what happens when you click http://bit.ly/Writehistorylive or http://bit.ly/WriteHistoryLive.  The URL is subtly different – you probably wouldn’t even notice if it wasn’t pointed out – but the end result is, of course, not a Nike-endorsed site.  And imagine if there was some darker skulduggery eg http://bit.ly/writehistoryLive.

We’ve been advising clients recently on shortened vanity URLs.  One of our recommendations is, if you’re going to use a shortened vanity URL – as opposed to the shortened URL you’re allocated – ensure you secure any obvious alternative spellings, and the basic variations on capital letters.

Clearly, in Nike’s case there are millions of permutations in the use of upper and lower case with a long phrase such as writehistorylive (wRiTEhistorylive, WRITEhistoryliveE, etc etc ), but at least go for the basics: ALLCAPS, CapOnEachNewWord, alllowercase, Capfirstletter.

Of course, the counter argument is that the vanity shortened URL is typically only ever a social media link, so the reader will click straight through and, hence, there’s no need to worry.  But if a phrase is central to a campaign – as I would argue writehistorylive is (why create it in the first place?) – then there’s a credible argument to say the URL could be passed on verbally.

It’s probably only a matter of time before we see an intellectual property court case sparked by a shortened vanity URL.

NB: Neither bit.ly, is.gd, Nike (clearly!) nor Adidas are clients of Umpf and all example shortened vanity URLs have been created to demonstrate a point rather than to pass off a brand or marketing campaign.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Fark
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Print this article!

RIP The Press Embargo

August 11th, 2009

So the Wall Street Journal has said it will no longer adhere to press release embargoes.  So what?  This really shouldn’t come as any shock to PR folk; it’s nothing new.

Back in 2008 TechCrunch, one of the most popular and influential IT blogs, publicly said it would deliberately break every embargo it was given by PR agencies.  It’s an interesting read which Read the rest of this entry »

Share and Enjoy:
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Fark
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Print this article!

How many castles in Ireland do you know?

July 9th, 2009

There’s a common misconception that public relations is a fairly recent innovation.  True enough, in the 20th Century Sigmund Freud and Edward Bernays popularised the discipline we recognise today as PR.

However, just like Australia and the US, they existed long before they were ‘discovered’. Read the rest of this entry »

Share and Enjoy:
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Fark
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Print this article!

Creative agencies, eh?

July 3rd, 2009

offices

Can Umpf really call itself a creative agency?  The problem is that we’re short of something here at Umpf Towers.

Although we’ve got some really cool offices – we’re in an old rope-making factory so we’ve got the exposed brick walls, original beams and we’re located on Read the rest of this entry »

Share and Enjoy:
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Fark
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Print this article!